Enforcing contract rights across borders – and across corporate structures.

Our client, a leading international manufacturer of professional ovens, faced a high-stakes contract dispute when a Swiss business partner refused to follow through on a major installation. The partner denied responsibility, challenged jurisdiction, and claimed the agreement had no legal basis. We stepped in to defend the contract – and made the case hold.

The Challenge

The Swiss counterparty argued that the contract had been signed by someone without authority – and not on behalf of the correct legal entity. They challenged the penalty clause, questioned the legal standing of the Luxembourg-based company, and disputed the court’s jurisdiction altogether.


It wasn’t just about a failed deal.

It was about legal clarity, accountability – and the enforceability of cross-border contracts.

Our Approach

We represented the manufacturer in Luxembourg and built a clear, cross-jurisdictional argument.
Our team:

• Validated the company’s internal structure
and signatory authority
• Defended the contractual penalty as fair, proportional, and binding
• Argued for jurisdiction based on contractual terms and applicable legal frameworks
• Navigated a complex mix of international corporate arguments and local procedure

The Impact

The court sided fully with our client – confirming jurisdiction and ordering the Swiss party to pay significant compensation. The penalty clause was upheld, and the contract’s validity was reinforced.

A cross-border contract defended.
A global supplier protected.
And a clear message sent: business agreements travel – and so does accountability.